Partisan Politics and Aggregation Failure with Ignorant Voters†

نویسندگان

  • Faruk Gul
  • Wolfgang Pesendorfer
چکیده

We analyze how voter ignorance effects competing candidates’ policy choices and election outcomes. We show that voter ignorance of policy positions has no effect in large elections provided voters know the preference distribution in the electorate. We then explore a model where voters are ignorant of policy positions and of the preference distribution. In that case limit equilibria (as the number of voters gets large) yield partisan politics (i.e., candidates may not adopt the median favored policy) and aggregation failure (i.e., voters may reject the median preferred alternative). These non-Downsian conclusions hold even when candidates have weak policy preferences and mostly care about winning the election. † Financial support from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Divisive Politics and Accountability

The paper analyzes a political accountability game with an electorate of ’partisan’ and ’independent’ voters. It is shown that politicians have a strategic incentive to engage in ’divisive politics’, that is, to force some independent voters to take sides, even if the direct electoral benefits are higher for their opponents than for themselves. By polarizing the electorate, the incumbent politi...

متن کامل

Voting Behavior, Preference Aggregation and Tax Design

The empirical evidence on voting behavior suggests that the individuals’ choice of the vote is explained, among other things, by policy issues and the voters’ partisan preferences over the party that rules the government. The evidence also indicates that the voters’ partisan preferences are the best predictor of the choice of the vote (Republican and Democratic voters tend to vote, respectively...

متن کامل

Party attachment and political accountability

This paper analyzes a political accountability model with an electorate of ’partisan’and ’swing’voters. It is shown that politicians have a strategic incentive to engage in ’divisive politics’(that is, to force some independent voters to take sides) even if the direct electoral bene…ts are higher for their opponents than for themselves. By polarizing the electorate, the incumbent politician wea...

متن کامل

Policy Herding as a Challenge to Political Persuasion∗

Can rationally ignorant voters and informed politicians lead to persistently inefficient policies in a democracy? A long tradition of thought in political science and economics has answered negatively, due to the averaging out of randomly uninformed voters or persuasion attempts in a competitive setting. Rather, explanations for the persistence of inefficient policies has focused on interest gr...

متن کامل

Zaller's Theory of Media Politics: Testing the deductions at the state level

Professor John Zaller has developed "A Theory of Media Politics" that posits a system of political campaigns in which voters, presidential candidates and the media are dependent on one another (Zaller, 1998). This theory is a direct descendant of An Economic Theory of Democracy, (Downs, 1957) which portrays voters and candidates as rational actors. Zaller's theory expands Downs' model to includ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004